The facts.
Concrete elements visible on your page — CTA presence and placement, actions competing for attention, trust signals, navigation, and structure.
Every Levri score is built from three layers; what we detect on the page, what we observe against tested CRO patterns, and what we reward when the page does it right. Transparent. Evidence-led. Never a black box.
Concrete elements visible on your page — CTA presence and placement, actions competing for attention, trust signals, navigation, and structure.
Behavioural patterns informed by real-world conversion behaviour — clarity of messaging, friction in the conversion flow, cognitive load, and visual hierarchy.
Strong patterns are rewarded — not just bad ones penalised. Clear positioning, narrative clarity, focused action design, and evidence-backed decisions count toward your score.
Five behavioural pillars, each scored independently and rolled into one weighted result. The same five pillars you see on your in-app report — never a different set for marketing.
Whether the page tells a visitor what it is, who it's for, and why it matters — in the first read.
Whether the eye moves through the page in the order that drives action — or fights the layout to find it.
How much effort the page asks a visitor to spend before they can decide what to do next.
Every drag on momentum between intent and action — competing CTAs, dead pathways, formal hesitation.
Whether the page earns belief at the moments belief matters — proof, reassurance, social signal.
A sample of the concrete page failures the engine recognises — each one tied to a real element in the DOM, not a generic best-practice checklist.
Further reading: deeper teardowns of pricing-page decision psychology and SaaS funnel optimisation — each grounded in the same scoring methodology.
Levri scores behavioural effectiveness — not visual taste. Two pages can look identical and score 25 points apart, because what the engine reads is structural, not stylistic.
Every issue carries a base severity — Levri then multiplies it by four context factors. The top of your fix list is the one that moves your number the most, not the one that's easiest to write a ticket for.
Base penalty for the rule violation — how badly this departs from a well-formed page.
How much fixing it typically moves conversion in comparable pages. Calibrated, not estimated.
How strong the underlying signal is. Weak signals weigh less; opinion-shaped signals weigh least.
Above-the-fold and structural issues outrank surface ones — visitors see them first.
Where the fix sits on your list — top of the page is the highest leverage.
Smart guardrail: copy-level fixes are intentionally de-prioritised when bigger structural issues remain — so you ship the change that moves your number first, not the one that's easiest to write.
Two short lists: what the scoring engine deliberately does, and the four things it refuses to do.
Paste any URL. Get a scored fix list in 60 seconds. No install. No card.
Scan my site — free